Tools

Free Trademark Search and Conflict Pre-Check

This free trademark search tool is a pre-check for a trade mark search, trademark lookup and similar mark (knockout) search. Type your mark, pick the Nice classes and countries: see absolute ground indicators, tested search links for each office and a transparent conflict indicator for the result file you export. No sign-up; your data stays in your browser.

This is an automated, general pre-screening based on what you entered. It is not legal advice and not a trade mark attorney service. Official registers are kept by each office; data shown here may be incomplete or delayed. Only the office decides on registration, and third parties may oppose. Please consult a qualified trade mark attorney or lawyer before filing.

Your mark, description and uploaded files are processed in your browser; nothing is sent to our server or stored.

Result

Three step check

Type a name and press Check; the three steps fill in here.

IndicatorNot legal advice
  1. Pre-check

    instant

    We look at the name itself: descriptive or common words, place names, very short names and closeness to well known brands.

  2. Check the records

    one click

    We open the trade mark records of your country with your name filled in; you run the search and the results stay on your screen.

  3. What did you see?

    plain answer

    Pick what the list showed; we explain in plain words what it means and what to do next.

    What did the list show?

This is a pre-screening, not legal advice. The office decides; talk to a trade mark attorney or lawyer before filing.

How do I check if a name is trademarked?

To check if a name is trademarked, search the official register of each country where you will sell, filtered by the Nice classes of your goods or services: USPTO Trademark Search, UKIPO, EUIPO eSearch, IP Australia, CIPO or IP India. Search sound-alike and look-alike spellings too, because confusingly similar marks can block you, not only identical ones.

How to do a trademark search

  1. Choose the countries and the goods or services you will use the name for.
  2. Find the matching Nice classes.
  3. Search each office: USPTO Trademark Search, UKIPO, EUIPO eSearch or TMview, IP Australia, CIPO, IP India.
  4. Search spelling and sound-alike variants, not just the exact word, in your classes and related ones (for example 9 and 42).
  5. Check unregistered use: company registers, domains, app stores and social handles.
  6. Export the results and have a trademark attorney review anything close before filing.

Does the office check for similar marks on its own?

Not everywhere. The USPTO examiner refuses a mark likely to cause confusion with a registered or earlier-filed mark (Section 2(d)). The UKIPO, EUIPO and the German DPMA do not refuse on earlier marks by themselves; the owners of earlier marks have to oppose. TÜRKPATENT refuses on its own only near-identical marks for the same kind of goods. IP Australia, CIPO and IP India also examine conflicts with earlier marks.

How offices examine similar marks
OfficeExamines earlier similar marks itself?Opposition periodForeign applicantsOur search route
Türkiye (TÜRKPATENT)Partly ex officio: only identical or indistinguishably similar signs for identical or same-type goods/services (SMK 5/1(ç)); other conflicts only on opposition (SMK 6).2 months from publication in the Bulletin; no extension, fee within the same period (SMK art. 18).Applicants resident abroad must act through a registered trade mark or patent attorney (SMK art. 160/3).Form and copy term; TMview (TR)
Germany (DPMA)Relative grounds only on opposition (MarkenG §§ 9, 42); the DPMA examines only absolute grounds ex officio (§ 37), narrow exception for notorious marks (§ 37(4)).3 months from publication of the registration (post-registration opposition); no reinstatement (MarkenG §§ 42, 91).Persons without domicile, seat or establishment in Germany must appoint a Rechtsanwalt or Patentanwalt (MarkenG § 96).DPMA expert query with wildcards; TMview (DE)
United States (USPTO)Ex officio: the examining attorney refuses on likelihood of confusion (15 U.S.C. 1052(d), TMEP 1207.01); dilution only in opposition.30 days from publication; extensions up to 180 days in total (15 U.S.C. 1063(a), 37 CFR 2.102(c)).Applicants domiciled outside the US must be represented by a US-licensed attorney (37 CFR 2.11(a)).Form and copy term; TMview (US)
United Kingdom (UKIPO)No ex officio refusal on relative grounds since 2007; earlier owners may be notified, refusal only on opposition (Relative Grounds Order 2007).2 months from publication; 3 months if Form TM7A is filed (TMA 1994 s.38, TMR 2008 r.17).No attorney required; an address for service in the UK, Gibraltar or the Channel Islands is required (TMR 2008 r.11).Form and copy term; TMview (GB)
European Union (EUIPO)Relative grounds only on opposition (EUTMR arts 8, 46); owners of earlier EU marks cited in the search report are informed on publication (art. 43(7)).3 months from publication of the application; not entered until the fee is paid (EUTMR art. 46).Parties without domicile or real establishment in the EEA: a professional representative is required in all proceedings except filing the application (EUTMR art. 119(2)).eSearch link; TMview (EM)
Australia (IP Australia)Ex officio: earlier substantially identical or deceptively similar marks are examined (Trade Marks Act 1995 s.44).Notice of intention to oppose within 2 months of advertised acceptance, grounds 1 month later (Act s.52, Reg 5.6).No attorney required; an address for service in Australia or New Zealand is required (s.215).Quick search link; TMview (AU)
Canada (CIPO)Ex officio: a mark confusing with a registered mark or an earlier pending application is refused (Trademarks Act s.12(1)(d), s.37(1)(c)).2 months from advertisement; extendable under s.47 (Trademarks Act s.38(1)).No mandatory Canadian agent or address found; anyone representing must be a licensed trademark agent (Regs s.25).Double encoded search link; TMview (CA)
India (IP India)Ex officio: s.11(1) conflicts are examined (search under Rules r.33); reputation and passing-off grounds only on opposition (s.11(5)).3 months from advertisement, plus at most 1 month (Trade Marks Act 1999 s.21(1)).No agent required; an address for service in India (postal plus e-mail) is required (Rules 2017 r.17).OTP login form; TMview (IN, partial)
International (TMview, WIPO)WIPO does no substantive examination; each designated office applies its own law and may notify a provisional refusal within 12 or 18 months (Madrid Protocol art. 5(2)).No opposition at WIPO; oppositions are filed in each designated country under its own time limits.No representative required before WIPO; filing goes through the office of origin, local representation rules apply after a provisional refusal.TMview unfiltered and Madrid (WO); WIPO GBD form

General rules only; for how periods are calculated and for exceptions, see the office's current guidance. Source: offices.json, primary texts read on 1 October 2026.

USPTO trademark search (TESS has been replaced)

The USPTO's Trademark Search system replaced TESS on 30 November 2023. Its result page does not carry the query in the address, so no direct link is possible: our tool copies the term, opens the search form in a new tab and prepares the same query as a fuzzy TMview search in US data. State registers and unregistered common law use do not appear in these searches; a full US clearance search covers them as well.

Unlike in Europe, the USPTO examines likelihood of confusion itself: the examining attorney refuses a mark likely to be confused with a registered mark (15 U.S.C. 1052(d), TMEP 1207.01), so a high conflict indicator for a US record is flagged as an examination refusal indicator. The opposition period is 30 days from publication and can be extended to 180 days in total (37 CFR 2.102(c)).

Applicants domiciled outside the United States must be represented by a US-licensed attorney (37 CFR 2.11(a)); this tool is not a filing service. Official fees: Base application fee 350 USD per class; surcharges of 100 USD per class for insufficient information and 200 USD per class for a free-form identification. Read on the office fee page on 1 October 2026, Source.

UK trade mark search (UKIPO)

The UKIPO trade mark search site is protected by a security check against automated systems, so its address parameters could not be tested; our tool copies the term and opens the form, and adds a tested TMview link with the UK (GB) filter for a fuzzy search of the same term.

Since 1 October 2007, the UKIPO does not refuse an application on earlier marks by itself; it may notify earlier owners, and refusal comes only through opposition (Relative Grounds Order 2007, TMA 1994 s.5). The opposition period is two months from publication in the Trade Marks Journal, extended to three months with Form TM7A. No attorney is required, but you need an address for service in the UK, Gibraltar or the Channel Islands (TMR 2008 r.11).

After Brexit, EU trade marks no longer protect a brand in the UK, so the UK needs its own search and filing. Official fees: 205 GBP online for the first class and 60 GBP for each additional class; Right Start starts at 125 GBP. Read on the office fee page on 1 October 2026, Source.

EU trade mark search (EUIPO eSearch and TMview)

For EU trade marks we open EUIPO's eSearch plus with your term in the link; the same query can run as a fuzzy TMview search with the EU (EM) filter. In eSearch you select records and use "Export .xlsx"; each export holds at most 100 records (one page) and is really an Excel 97-2003 file. Our built-in reader opens it and parses the D/M/YYYY dates and Nice classes.

EUIPO examines only absolute grounds on its own; refusal on earlier marks happens only upon opposition (EUTMR arts 8, 46). The opposition period is three months from publication of the application, and an opposition counts only once the fee is paid. Applicants from outside the EEA may file the application themselves but need a professional representative for every later step (art. 119(2)).

An EU trade mark covers all member states; for the UK and other countries, search separately or through the Madrid system. Official fees: 850 EUR online basic fee for one class, 50 EUR for the second class, 150 EUR for each further class. Read on the office fee page on 1 October 2026, Source.

Australian trade mark search

Our link opens IP Australia's quick search with your term (tested on 1 October 2026), and a TMview link covers the same term in Australian data. IP Australia also offers its official TM Checker, a free app that gives feedback on whether an application is likely to face problems in examination; we recommend it alongside our multi-office pre-check.

IP Australia examines conflicts itself: an application is rejected if the mark is substantially identical with or deceptively similar to an earlier mark for similar goods or closely related services (Trade Marks Act 1995 s.44), subject to honest concurrent use exceptions. After acceptance is advertised, a notice of intention to oppose is due within two months, followed by the grounds one month later. No attorney is required, but you need an address for service in Australia or New Zealand.

Official fees: 250 AUD per class with the picklist, 400 AUD per class without it. Read on the office fee page on 1 October 2026, Source.

Canadian trademark search (CIPO)

The CIPO search link carries its JSON payload encoded twice; our tool builds it for you. The pattern was tested on 1 October 2026; an automated recheck the same day was blocked by the CIPO firewall in a headless browser, so open it in your normal browser. Results can be exported with "Export Results CSV"; the column names are not verified yet, so check the column mapping after uploading.

CIPO examines conflicts itself: a mark confusing with a registered trademark or an earlier pending application is refused (Trademarks Act s.12(1)(d), s.37(1)(c)). The opposition period is two months from advertisement and can be extended under s.47. We found no rule that forces foreign applicants to appoint a Canadian agent; anyone who represents you before the office must be a licensed trademark agent.

Official fees: 491.06 CAD online for the first class, 149.04 CAD for each additional class (2026 fees; CIPO has announced a 1.7% increase on 1 January 2027). Read on the office fee page on 1 October 2026, Source.

India trade mark search (IP India public search)

Many guides still describe the IP India public search as free and open. In our test on 1 October 2026 it required an e-mail or mobile OTP login and an arithmetic captcha, so no link can carry your term. Our tool copies the term, opens the official page and adds a TMview link for Indian data, whose coverage may be partial (34 SOLARIS records in TMview).

The Registrar examines conflicts with earlier marks itself under s.11(1) and searches earlier registrations and applications (Rules 2017 r.33); reputation and passing off grounds come only through opposition. The opposition period is three months from advertisement plus at most one month. Every applicant needs an address for service in India, with a postal and an e-mail address (r.17).

Official fees: TM-A e-filing, per class and per mark: individuals, startups and small enterprises 4,500 INR, all other applicants 9,000 INR. Read on the office fee page on 1 October 2026, Source.

Turkey (TÜRKPATENT) and Germany (DPMA)

Türkiye: the TÜRKPATENT trade mark research screen searches contains, starts with or equals, by class, with no phonetic option, and the query never appears in the address; we copy the term and open the form, and add a fuzzy TMview search in Turkish data. TÜRKPATENT refuses on its own only identical or near-identical marks for goods of the same kind, which usually means the same subgroup of a class (SMK 5/1(ç)); other conflicts need an opposition within two months of publication (SMK 6, 18). Foreign applicants must use a Turkish trade mark or patent attorney. Official fees: 2,820 TRY for one class, 2,820 TRY for the second class, 3,150 TRY for each class from the third; registration fee 7,010 TRY on top. Read on the office fee page on 1 October 2026, Source.

Germany: DPMAregister's expert search accepts wildcards (? any characters, ! one character, # zero or one); our tool builds such queries for you. The DPMA examines only absolute grounds; conflicts with earlier marks need an opposition within three months of publication of the registration (MarkenG §§ 9, 42). Applicants without a German address must appoint a Rechtsanwalt or Patentanwalt (§ 96). Official fees: 290 EUR online, including up to three classes; 100 EUR for each class from the fourth. Read on the office fee page on 1 October 2026, Source.

International search: TMview, WIPO Global Brand Database, Madrid

TMview brings together data from many offices, including the EU, the UK, the US, Canada, India, Australia and Türkiye. Our tool generates tested links for an unfiltered fuzzy search and for international registrations under the Madrid system (WO); you can export results to Excel and upload them here. The EUIPN legal notice allows deep links but not framing, so links open in a new tab.

The WIPO Global Brand Database covers about 76.9 million records from 89 sources, but its terms forbid automated queries and more than 10 searches per minute, and query links do not survive a new session; we therefore only open the search form. Madrid Monitor is for tracking the status of an international registration.

WIPO does no substantive examination; each designated country applies its own law and may notify a provisional refusal within 12 or 18 months (Madrid Protocol art. 5(2)). Official fees: Basic fee 653 CHF (black and white) or 903 CHF (colour); a complementary fee of 100 CHF per designated country or that country's individual fee; the office of origin may add a transmittal fee. Read on the office fee page on 1 October 2026, Source.

How similarity is measured (Method v1.0)

The conflict indicator is a versioned, open formula that applies the same rules to every earlier record you import; there is no black box. It makes the global appreciation used in trade mark law (visual, aural and conceptual similarity, similarity of goods and services, strength of the earlier mark) visible in numbers; it does not replace it.

Signs are normalised first: lower case with the Turkish dotted and dotless i rule, folded accents (ç>c, ş>s, ğ>g, ı>i, ö>o, ü>u, ä>a, ß>ss, é>e), punctuation and spaces removed; digits and number words are also compared in their equivalent forms (4 and "for"). Company forms and generic affixes are recorded separately.

S = max(0.5·V + 0.4·A + 0.1·C ; 0.9·max(V, A)) If C is not assessed, the linear part is (0.5·V + 0.4·A) / 0.9 R = round(100 · S^1.3 · G · D)

The exponent 1.3 models interdependence: very high similarity between the signs partly compensates for weaker similarity of the goods. The overall conflict indicator is the highest R; the number of records with R ≥ 50 is also shown.

VVisual

On the skeleton: 0.5 × Jaro-Winkler + 0.5 × normalised Levenshtein (code point safe), +0.03 for the same first letter and +0.03 for the same first three letters; at most 0.99 unless identical. If one sign appears in the other as an independent word: 0.75 + 0.25 × (short / long); for multi-word signs, the most similar word pair weighted by its share. V is the highest of the three.

AAural

Phonetic code by the office's public: Kölner Phonetik for Germany, Double Metaphone for the US, UK, Australia, Canada and India, rule-based Turkish reading (native and foreign) for Türkiye, and the highest across languages for EU and international records. 1 if the codes match, otherwise normalised Levenshtein between the codes.

CConceptual

A 449-row concept dictionary covering TR, EN, DE and Latin, Italian, Spanish and French forms (e.g. Güneş, Sun, Sonne, Sol). If both signs have a concept: 1 for a shared concept, otherwise 0; if none is found, C shows "not assessed" and is not counted as 0.

GGoods and services

1.0 same term; 0.9 same Communiqué subgroup for Turkish records; 0.7 same class; 0.5 curated related classes (such as 25 and 35); 0.3 a pair only on the USPTO coordinated class list (pairs coordinated with every class, such as 35 and 42, only for US records); 0.1 otherwise. If a class is unknown, the worst case 1.0 is used and flagged.

DRecord strength

Status × distinctiveness. Status: registered 1.0; application or opposition stage 0.9; expired within the renewal grace period (6 months assumed) 0.3; dead, refused or past the grace period 0.1; unknown status 1.0. If the shared element is descriptive or generic for the class, distinctiveness is 0.5, otherwise 1.0.

RBands and coverage

Bands: 0-24 low, 25-49 medium, 50-74 high, 75-100 very high. The indicator reads like 87/100; it is not a percentage or a legal probability. Coverage: every office card states "Link ready, no result file uploaded: not measured" or "Scored from file". Where we only provide links, no conflict score is computed; only the absolute grounds indicator and the class guide are shown.

Office rule layer

  • Türkiye: same skeleton and G ≥ 0.9 gives "ex officio refusal indicator (SMK 5/1(ç))"; same skeleton and class with an unknown subgroup gives "check the subgroup"; any other R ≥ 50 gives "opposition indicator (SMK 6/1)".
  • Germany, EU, UK: R ≥ 50 gives an "opposition indicator"; the office does not refuse on earlier marks by itself.
  • US, Australia, Canada, India: R ≥ 50 gives an "examination refusal indicator"; the office examines likelihood of confusion itself.
  • International registrations depend on the designated country; IR records covering Germany use the German rule.

Known limits

  • Logos, figurative, colour and sound marks are not measured; figurative records in DPMA files without a word element stay "not measured".
  • Unregistered rights, company names, domain names and unpublished applications do not show up.
  • TMview data can be incomplete or delayed for some offices (SOLARIS: 103 records in TMview, 121 at TÜRKPATENT).
  • The concept dictionary is small; most translations stay "not assessed".
  • The reputation and market strength of the earlier mark are not in the score; the level of attention and the relevant public are not assessed.
  • The indicator is not a legal finding of similarity, likelihood of confusion or registrability.

Calibration examples

Example pairs that show how the algorithm behaves; they are not court or office decisions. The R column assumes the same class (G 0.7) and a registered record (D 1.0).

Calibration pairs and indicators
PairOffice publicVACSR (same class)
Meier / MaierGermany0.871not assessed0.92864/100
Meier / MayerGermany0.711not assessed0.961/100
Telekom / TelecomGermany0.961not assessed0.97868/100
Fantasie / PhantasieGermany0.831110.91662/100
LUCKY / LUCKIUnited States0.921not assessed0.95666/100
SOLARIS / SOLARYSEuropean Union0.96110.9868/100
KAFE / CAFETürkiye0.7921not assessed0.961/100
GÜNEŞ / SUNTürkiye0.5440.410.53231/100
Sonnenschein / SunshineEuropean Union0.6040.810.72246/100
SOLARIS / SOLARIS BUS & COACHEuropean Union0.8670.85510.87659/100
SOLARIS / POLARISEuropean Union0.8810.75not assessed0.82354/100
SOLARIS / NOVAEuropean Union0.44000.39621/100
Changelogv1.0, 1 October 2026: first release. If weights or thresholds change, the version number goes up and the change is listed here.

Absolute grounds: the sign itself

A sign can be refused regardless of earlier marks: if it lacks distinctive character, describes the kind, quality, quantity, purpose, geographical origin or time of the goods, or is customary in the trade. Our tool shows these risks as none, attention or high, with the legal basis and source of every hit; a hit is not a refusal finding, and acquired distinctiveness is assessed separately.

  • Generic termsThe sign or one of its words appears as a goods or services term in the official Nice list of your classes (e.g. SHOES in class 25).
  • Descriptive and laudatory wordsPraise (premium, super, best), quantity, purpose, time and quality terms; examples from the office guidelines (TÜRKPATENT, EUIPO, DPMA, USPTO, UKIPO) and our own compilation are marked separately.
  • Geographical namesCountries, provinces, states and major cities (Unicode CLDR and GeoNames); high if the whole sign is a place name, attention if it is one element.
  • Turkish patternsPatterns such as "... USTASI" (master of), "... SEVİYORUZ" and "I LOVE ..." are dealt with separately in the TÜRKPATENT guideline.
  • Short signs and numbersA single letter gives high, two letters and plain numbers give attention.
  • Company forms and domainsForms such as Inc, Ltd, GmbH and extensions such as .com are not distinctive elements.
  • Widely known names1,383 names from the Interbrand, Kantar BrandZ and Brand Finance rankings; short names only on an exact match. Being on the list is not a legal finding of a reputation; the basis is the rule on marks with a reputation (a relative ground).
Absolute grounds basis by office
OfficeNo distinctive characterDescriptiveGeneric or customaryWidely known name (relative)
Türkiye (TÜRKPATENT)SMK 5/1(b)SMK 5/1(c)SMK 5/1(d)SMK 6/4, 6/5
Germany (DPMA)MarkenG § 8(2) Nr. 1MarkenG § 8(2) Nr. 2MarkenG § 8(2) Nr. 3MarkenG § 9(1) Nr. 3, § 10
European Union (EUIPO)EUTMR Art. 7(1)(b)EUTMR Art. 7(1)(c)EUTMR Art. 7(1)(d)EUTMR Art. 8(5)
United Kingdom (UKIPO)TMA 1994 s.3(1)(b)TMA 1994 s.3(1)(c)TMA 1994 s.3(1)(d)TMA 1994 s.5(3)
United States (USPTO)TMEP 120215 U.S.C. 1052(e)(1)TMEP 1209.01(c)15 U.S.C. 1052(d), 1125(c)
Australia (IP Australia)TMA 1995 s.41TMA 1995 s.41TMA 1995 s.41TMA 1995 s.60
Canada (CIPO)Trademarks Act s.32, s.37(1)Trademarks Act s.12(1)(b)Trademarks Act s.12(1)(c)Trademarks Act s.12(1)(d), s.16
India (IP India)TMA 1999 s.9(1)(a)TMA 1999 s.9(1)(b)TMA 1999 s.9(1)(c)TMA 1999 s.11(2)

Nice classes and choosing a class

Goods and services fall into 45 Nice classes: 1 to 34 are goods, 35 to 45 services. The tool suggests classes from your description and passes the classes you pick both to the office links (TMview and DPMA class filters) and to the G component of the conflict indicator. Being in the same class is not in itself evidence that goods are similar.

For all 45 current class headings, commonly confused pairs (9 and 42, 25 and 35, 29, 30 and 43) and notes for filing, use our trademark class finder.

© World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), 2026. Nice Classification NCL 13-2026; source: WIPO, reformatted.

Written by
  • Digital Marketing Expert
  • Google Partner
  • Full Stack Developer
Last updated
Based on
5 sources

How to use the trademark search tool

  1. Type the name and pick a country

    Type your brand name in the Quick check box, pick the country where you will sell and press Check. On the English page, United States is selected by default.

  2. Read the pre-check

    The Pre-check card sums up the name with a green, amber or red indicator and gives the reasons in plain words. Green is not an office decision, because it only looks at the name.

  3. Search the records

    The big button in the Check the records card opens the records of your country with your name filled in. If an office form ignores the link, the second button opens the form and copies the name for you.

  4. Pick what you saw

    In the What did you see card, tap The same name came up, Similar names came up or Nothing came up. The tool then explains what that means under the rules of that country and what to do next.

  5. Score the list or switch to Advanced

    Copy the result table and paste it into the list box; you get the number of identical and similar records. For classes, variants, file import and the report, switch to the Advanced pre-screening tab.

The conflict indicator in short

This card summarises the Method v1.0 section on this page and uses the same weights. That section holds the full definitions and the calibration pairs. Here, instead, we read the formula as a decision order.

Sign similarityS = max(0.5·V + 0.4·A + 0.1·C ; 0.9·max(V, A))
If C is not assessedlinear part = (0.5·V + 0.4·A) / 0.9
Goods and services proximityG: 1.0 same term; 0.9 same TR subgroup; 0.7 same class; 0.5 related class; 0.3 USPTO coordinated pair only; 0.1 other
Record strengthD = status × distinctiveness; status: registered 1.0, application 0.9, expired in grace period 0.3, dead 0.1; weak shared element: distinctiveness 0.5
Conflict indicatorR = round(100 · S^1.3 · G · D)
Bands0-24 low; 25-49 medium; 50-74 high; 75-100 very high

Because the formula multiplies, G and D set a ceiling. Even with S and D at their maximum, a record in an unrelated class (G 0.1) cannot exceed 10. Likewise, a record in a related class (G 0.5) cannot exceed 50. So R ≥ 50 needs goods or services at least as close as a related class. Also, the indicator is not a percentage or a legal probability.

Example calculation: SOLARYS against hypothetical earlier records

In this example the user screens SOLARYS for classes 9 and 42. The earlier records are hypothetical, not real register results. We computed the values with the tool's engine under Method v1.0.

Earlier record (hypothetical)OfficeClass and statusSGDR and bandOffice rule
SOLARISEU (EM)9, registered0.980.71.068, highOpposition indicator
SOLARISUS42, application0.980.70.961, highExamination refusal indicator
POLARYSGermany (DE)9, registered0.8230.71.054, highOpposition indicator
SOLARISEU (EM)41, registered0.980.51.049, mediumNone (R below 50)
SOLARISEU (EM)9, expired in grace period0.980.70.320, lowNone
SOLARISGermany (DE)25, registered0.980.11.010, lowNone
SOLARYSTürkiye (TR)9, same subgroup, registered1.00.91.090, very highTR ex officio refusal indicator (SMK 5/1(ç))

The same pair of signs (SOLARYS and SOLARIS) drops from 68 to 10 as class and status change. So read R together with the G and D columns. Class 41 sits next to class 9 in the related class table, which gives G 0.5. In the POLARYS row the concept dictionary found no match, so C stays not assessed. In the last row, the user picked the record's subgroup under Türkiye subgroups.

After filing: when the opposition window opens and who can oppose

The office table on this page sums up the periods. This table, instead, shows which event opens the window and who may file. It is general information, so check the office's current text for counting rules and exceptions.

MarketWindow opens withPeriod and extensionWho can oppose
United StatesPublication of the mark30 days; extensions up to 180 days in totalAnyone who believes the registration would damage them
United KingdomPublication in the Trade Marks Journal2 months; 3 months with Form TM7AAnyone; relative grounds only the earlier right owner
European UnionPublication of the application3 months; no valid opposition until the fee arrives (EUTMR Article 46)Earlier mark owners and licensees they authorise, owners of unregistered signs, holders of geographical indications
AustraliaAdvertised acceptanceNotice of intention 2 months; grounds 1 month after thatAnyone, on the grounds in the Act
CanadaAdvertisement of the application2 months; extendable under s.47Anyone, with a fee; an opponent with no place of business in Canada gives a Canadian address for service
IndiaAdvertisement of the application3 months plus at most 1 monthAnyone; s.11(2) and (3) grounds only the earlier proprietor
GermanyPublication of the registration (register first, oppose later)3 months; no reinstatement (MarkenG § 42, § 91)Owners of earlier marks or commercial designations; holders of earlier geographical indications
TürkiyePublication in the Official Trade Mark Bulletin2 months; no extension, fee within the same period (SMK 18)Interested persons; relative grounds mostly the earlier right owner

US basis: 15 U.S.C. § 1063 and 37 CFR 2.102. UK and EU: TMA 1994 s.38, TMR 2008 r.17 and EUTMR Articles 8 and 46. Australia: Trade Marks Act 1995 s.52 with Regulations 5.6. Canada and India: Trademarks Act s.38 and Trade Marks Act 1999 s.21. Germany and Türkiye: MarkenG § 42 and § 91, SMK 18. We read the primary texts on 1 October 2026.

How do you choose a strong name before a trademark search?

A good trademark search result starts with a good name. Offices look at the sign itself first. If the name describes the goods or services, trouble can start before any earlier mark plays a role. That is why we suggest ranking your candidates on the distinctiveness scale, which comes from US practice (USPTO TMEP 1209.01). The UK, the EU, Germany and Türkiye do not use these labels. However, they test the same idea (TMA 1994 s.3, EUTMR Article 7, MarkenG § 8, SMK 5).

  • Fanciful: an invented word with no meaning, for example VELORIQ for software. With arbitrary marks, it forms the strong end of the scale.
  • Arbitrary: a real word with no link to the goods, for example TANGERINE for accounting software.
  • Suggestive: it hints at the goods without describing them, for example SOLARYS for software that monitors solar plants.
  • Descriptive: it states the kind, quality, purpose or origin of the goods, for example SOLAR MONITOR for that software.
  • Generic: the common name of the goods, for example SOFTWARE for software.

TMEP calls the first three groups inherently distinctive. In the US, descriptive matter needs acquired distinctiveness to reach the Principal Register (15 U.S.C. § 1052(f)). A generic term stays off both registers. In practice, most debates happen on the line between suggestive and descriptive. So it pays to show borderline names to a professional.

Run three more checks while you choose. First, say the name aloud in English and in the other languages of your markets. Our tool measures sound with Double Metaphone for English, Kölner Phonetik for German and its own rules for Turkish. Next, keep laudatory words (premium, best) and place names out of the core of the mark. Also, a deliberate misspelling of a descriptive word still sounds the same. If name and logo will work together, start brand identity work now to avoid costly changes later.

Why check domains and social handles alongside your trademark search?

Trademark registers show applications and registrations only. Unregistered rights, company names, domain names and unpublished applications often stay invisible in these searches. Our tool lists this among its known limits. In the US, a full search also covers state registers and common law use. The federal search does not show them. In the UK, the EU and Türkiye, earlier unregistered rights can also support an opposition under certain conditions. So we suggest completing the register search with the traces a name leaves online.

  • Domain names: our WHOIS lookup shows whether someone holds a domain, when they registered it and when it expires. Our guide to choosing a domain name then helps with the extension.
  • Earlier use: the website history tool shows from archive records whether a same-name domain was live before.
  • Ads and social media: an ad library search shows whether a business already advertises under the name. Also try the handle on Instagram, TikTok and YouTube.
  • Company registers and app stores: search Companies House or your local business register and the app stores for close names.

Does your name already sit on another Instagram account? Our Instagram username claim page explains the lawful routes. One spelling for domain, handles and mark also keeps customers from drifting to variants.

What can you do when a similar mark shows up?

A similar record does not close the road on its own, but we cannot give you the answer either. The questions below sharpen your file before you talk to a trademark attorney or lawyer. The tool's G and D columns also hint at most answers.

  1. Is the record still alive? A dead or refused record gets a low D. A registration in its renewal grace period may still come back, which is why the tool gives it 0.3.
  2. Are the goods and services really close? A shared class number is not proof of similarity. In the US, coordinated classes matter; in Türkiye, "same kind" in principle means the same subgroup of a class. Our trademark class finder shows commonly paired classes and the Türkiye subgroups.
  3. Is the record in your market? A registration protects in the country or region where it exists. For example, an EU trade mark covers every member state, Germany included, while the UK keeps a separate register.
  4. Does the owner actually use the mark? In Türkiye, for example, the applicant may ask for proof of genuine use during the opposition. This applies if the opposing mark has sat on the register there for at least five years (SMK 19/2).
  5. Is consent possible? In Türkiye, a notarised letter of consent from the earlier owner overcomes the SMK 5/1(ç) refusal (SMK 5/3). Elsewhere, local law decides what consent or coexistence agreements achieve.
  6. Is a new name cheaper? A name that contains the earlier mark as a separate word gets a visual score of at least 0.75. So an add-on like SOLARYS TECH rarely creates enough distance. A new candidate before you spend on logo, packaging and domains is often the cheaper route.

Is your logo ready and a change unavoidable? Our article on when you need a logo redesign helps you plan its scale.

How does the opposition timeline work in each market?

A trademark search is the step before filing. In most markets, the real test is the opposition window that opens after publication. The office examines the application, publishes it and then gives owners of earlier rights a fixed period. The office table on this page sums up the periods. By contrast, the table above shows which event opens the window and who may oppose.

Three differences change your planning. First, the US window is 30 days, but extensions can stretch it to 180 days in total. Second, Australia splits opposition into two steps: a notice of intention, then the grounds one month later. Finally, Germany registers first and accepts oppositions for three months after publishing the registration. So do not relax while that period runs, even with the certificate in hand.

Third parties can speak up too. In the EU, observations can only rely on absolute grounds (EUTMR Article 45). They must also reach the office before the opposition period ends. Germany likewise lets third parties file written observations on absolute grounds before registration, without becoming parties (MarkenG § 37(6)). Türkiye accepts observations from publication until registration, but the SMK 5/1(ç) ground needs an opposition (SMK 17/1).

Until the window closes, you can hold back spending that is hard to reverse. Think of printed packaging, signage or large ad budgets. This is calendar planning, not legal advice. If an opposition arrives, then manage the deadlines with your trademark attorney or lawyer.

How does the Madrid system work when you expand abroad?

The Madrid system lets you designate several countries with one international application. However, the application does not go straight to WIPO. It rests on an application or registration in your home country, the basic mark. That country's office, the office of origin, forwards it to WIPO (Madrid Protocol Article 2(2), Regulations Rule 9(1)). You also need a link to that office through nationality, domicile or a real and effective establishment.

WIPO does no substantive examination; it records an application that meets the formal requirements straight away (Protocol Article 3(4)). Each designated office then applies its own law. It may notify a provisional refusal within 12 months, or 18 months if that country made a declaration. An office that misses the deadline loses the right to refuse. Protection then works as if that office had registered the mark (Protocol Article 5(5)). Oppositions also run in each country under its own time limits, not at WIPO.

Fees come in layers. The WIPO basic fee is 653 CHF in black and white and 903 CHF in colour. It covers 10 years. On top, each class beyond three costs a 100 CHF supplementary fee. Each designated country without an individual fee also adds a 100 CHF complementary fee. Countries with individual fees set their own amounts, and the office of origin may add a transmittal fee. We read these amounts on 1 October 2026, so check them again on filing day.

Madrid is not the only route. An EU trade mark covers all member states in one filing, and the UK needs its own application. Whichever route you pick, screen every target country first. Use the TMview, Madrid (WO) link under the tool's International office and the national offices. If you make products under your own label, our private label guide covers how to build your own brand.

When should you bring in a trademark attorney or lawyer?

Talha Aslan and the team do not provide legal, trademark attorney or patent attorney services. Our tool is a pre-screening that applies the same rules to everyone. In the UK, only registered people may use the title registered trade mark attorney (Trade Marks Act 1994 s.84). Before the USPTO, with narrow exceptions, only attorneys may represent others in trademark matters (37 CFR 11.14). So we suggest a professional in these situations.

  • The score table shows a record with R ≥ 50, or the Türkiye card shows an ex officio refusal indicator.
  • The Absolute grounds indicator reads Attention or High and you do not want to drop the name.
  • You plan to file abroad. Applicants domiciled outside the US need a US-licensed attorney (37 CFR 2.11(a)). Without domicile, seat or establishment in Germany, you must appoint a Rechtsanwalt or Patentanwalt (MarkenG § 96). Outside the EEA, an EU applicant needs a professional representative for every step after filing (EUTMR Article 119(2)). UK filings need no attorney, only a UK, Gibraltar or Channel Islands address for service (TMR 2008 r.11).
  • You received an office refusal or a notice of opposition, or you plan a consent or coexistence agreement.

Bring the tool's report, the score table (CSV) and the search log to the meeting. The method version, time stamps and links you opened sit in the file. So the professional can repeat the same searches quickly. Once the legal side is clear, you can focus on building brand authority.

Common trademark search mistakes

  • MistakeSearching only for the identical nameDo this insteadSearch spelling and sound variants too. In Advanced pre-screening, use Fuzzy as the TMview search type and open every row in the variant list.
  • MistakeTreating a class number as proof of similarityDo this insteadCompare the goods and services themselves. Also check coordinated classes for US records and the subgroup for Türkiye records.
  • MistakeReading a clean result as a guaranteeDo this insteadThe tool cannot see unregistered use, company names or unpublished applications. So check them separately.
  • MistakeSearching only your home marketDo this insteadScreen every market where you will sell or manufacture. An EU trade mark covers Germany but not the UK.
  • MistakeFixing the logo and domain before the nameDo this insteadRun the pre-check first. Then secure the domain and handles, and leave the design spend for last.
  • MistakeReading the score as a percentage or a chance of approvalDo this insteadR is an indicator, not a probability. Read it with the G and D columns, and leave decisions in the high bands to a professional.

Frequently Asked Questions

Sources and legal notice

Sources

  1. 6769 sayılı Sınai Mülkiyet Kanunu (SMK md. 5, 6, 18, 160) · accessed 1 October 2026
  2. TÜRKPATENT, 6769 sayılı SMK 5. Madde İnceleme Kılavuzu · accessed 1 October 2026
  3. Tebliğ (TÜRKPATENT: 2026/2), Resmî Gazete 26.02.2026, 33180 · accessed 1 October 2026
  4. Markengesetz (MarkenG) § 8, § 9, § 37, § 42, § 96 · accessed 1 October 2026
  5. DPMAregister Hilfetext (Platzhalter, Expertenrecherche) · accessed 1 October 2026
  6. Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 (EUTMR) art. 7, 8, 46, 119 · accessed 1 October 2026
  7. 15 U.S.C. 1052 (Lanham Act § 2) · accessed 1 October 2026
  8. USPTO, TMEP (May 2026) 1207.01 · accessed 1 October 2026
  9. 37 CFR 2.11 (foreign-domiciled applicants) · accessed 1 October 2026
  10. Trade Marks Act 1994 (UK) s.3, s.5 · accessed 1 October 2026
  11. The Trade Marks (Relative Grounds) Order 2007 · accessed 1 October 2026
  12. Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) s.41, s.44 · accessed 1 October 2026
  13. Trademarks Act (Canada) s.12, s.37, s.38 · accessed 1 October 2026
  14. Madrid Protocol, art. 5 · accessed 1 October 2026
  15. EUIPN legal notices (TMview: deep links allowed, framing not) · accessed 1 October 2026
  16. WIPO Global Brand Database, Terms and Conditions · accessed 1 October 2026
  17. WIPO, Nice Classification NCL 13-2026 (download area) · accessed 1 October 2026
  18. DPMA, Nizza Klassifikation · accessed 1 October 2026
  19. USPTO, Using coordinated classes in your federal trademark search · accessed 1 October 2026
  20. Kölner Phonetik (Postel 1969), Beschreibung · accessed 1 October 2026
  21. L. Philips, The Double Metaphone Search Algorithm, C/C++ Users Journal 18(6), June 2000 · accessed 1 October 2026
  22. PHP levenshtein() (byte based; reason for our code point implementation) · accessed 1 October 2026
  23. TÜRKPATENT: official fee page · accessed 1 October 2026
  24. DPMA: official fee page · accessed 1 October 2026
  25. USPTO: official fee page · accessed 1 October 2026
  26. UKIPO: official fee page · accessed 1 October 2026
  27. EUIPO: official fee page · accessed 1 October 2026
  28. IP Australia: official fee page · accessed 1 October 2026
  29. CIPO: official fee page · accessed 1 October 2026
  30. IP India: official fee page · accessed 1 October 2026
  31. TMview, WIPO: official fee page · accessed 1 October 2026

Data and attribution

  • Geographical names: GeoNames (geonames.org), CC BY 4.0, filtered and reformatted; Unicode CLDR 48.2.3, Unicode License v3.
  • Name list: Interbrand Best Global Brands 2025, Kantar BrandZ 2026, Brand Finance 2026 rankings; names only, not a legal finding of a reputation.
  • Related classes: our curated pairs and USPTO, List of coordinated classes.
  • TMview data is not copied into our tool; you download results from the office site yourself. Source: TMview (free service).
  • © World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), 2026. Nice Classification NCL 13-2026; source: WIPO, reformatted.

This is an automated, general pre-screening based on what you entered. It is not legal advice and not a trade mark attorney service. Official registers are kept by each office; data shown here may be incomplete or delayed. Only the office decides on registration, and third parties may oppose. Please consult a qualified trade mark attorney or lawyer before filing.

Talha Aslan and team do not provide legal, trade mark attorney or patent attorney services. This tool applies the same rules to every query and does not review your individual case. Similarity scores are statistical indicators, not a legal finding of similarity or likelihood of confusion. This tool is not endorsed by or affiliated with EUIPO, USPTO, UKIPO, DPMA, TÜRKPATENT, WIPO or any other office. Results on linked official pages are the responsibility of the respective office.

An independent tool with no link to any office; office names are used descriptively, never as an endorsement.

Links last checked: 1 October 2026Method v1.0 · Nice NCL 13-2026

Looking for a distinctive name and identity?

Talha Aslan and the team build distinctive names, logos and brand identities. For filing and legal advice, please work with a qualified trade mark attorney or lawyer.

Brand Identity

Related Tools

All Tools (91)
Trademark Class FinderDescribe what you sell and get suggested Nice classes, with all 45 current class headings, commonly paired classes and notes for filing in the US, UK, EU and Turkey.
WHOIS Lookup & Domain AgeSee who a domain is registered with, when it was created and expires, its exact age and whether it looks available. Free, no sign-up.
Ad Library SearchFind a brand's ads across the Meta, Google, TikTok, LinkedIn and Microsoft EU ad libraries in one search, with Microsoft Ads copy and reach analysis.
Search Term N-Gram AnalyzerBreak your Google Ads search terms report into 1, 2 and 3 word phrases, total clicks, cost and conversions for each, and turn the wasteful ones into a negative keyword list.
Responsive Search Ad BuilderWrite the 15 headlines and 4 descriptions of a responsive search ad with live character limits, preview how the ad shows on Google mobile and desktop, and export it.
CTR Calculator & SEO Traffic EstimatorCalculate click-through rate, compare it with benchmarks and see how many visits and sales you would gain by ranking higher on Google.